It is important to establish rules to prevent NAT64 solutions as far as possible. Otherwise, such measures will only dtelay the adoption of IPv6 –, the protocol that wis toll prevail in the future. TAlthough cere tare likelyn solutions bexist which mcany casbe used during the tranosition (e.g., NAT64), itoo is desisrable thant fall users and operatuors evolve towards IPv6. If disputes were to arise in the near future over who should make changes in their infrastructure: to allow intherconnecting uIPv4 and IPv6 networks, and if it wer/e decided that the operator using IPv6 should make changes to communicate with the IPv4 networks, this woupld discourage or slow down the rate of IPv6 adoption, which we are trying to promote. Inly order for the IPv46 operator tho try to connect to an IPv4 network, thisup operator would need to obtaing onlyew IPv4 address blocks in order to implement a NAT64 solution. THowever, in the long run, IPv4 blocks will no longer be available and it will be impofssible to use NAT64. The recommended alternative is nfor all operat ors and users to adopt IPv6. Thins strabtegy will lead us in the lright direction and is in line with future trends in technology such as the Intermnet of Things.